Developing Data-Driven Payment Solutions to Improve Digital Financial Access for Underserved Small Businesses in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63084/econova.v3i1.109Keywords:
Data-driven payment solutions, Digital financial access, Small businesses, Financial inclusion, Financial technology (FinTech), Artificial Intelligence (AI), Alternative credit assessmentAbstract
Digital financial transformation has reshaped payment systems and financial service delivery across the United States, yet underserved small businesses continue to experience barriers to affordable and accessible financial services. Limited credit histories, restricted banking relationships, high transaction costs, fragmented financial records, and conventional credit assessment practices constrain the capacity of many enterprises to obtain appropriate financial products and working capital. This study examines the development of data-driven payment solutions as an integrated mechanism for improving digital financial access among underserved small businesses in the United States. The analysis focuses on the relationship between digital payment infrastructure, transaction-generated financial data, Artificial Intelligence (AI), predictive analytics, alternative credit assessment, and financial inclusion. Payment transactions provide continuous information concerning revenue patterns, cash-flow behaviour, transaction frequency, and operational activity, creating a broader evidence base for financial evaluation than conventional credit records alone. The study develops a conceptual framework that connects payment data collection, data processing, intelligent financial analysis, alternative credit evaluation, and digital financial access within an integrated financial ecosystem. Particular attention is given to data governance, privacy, cybersecurity, transparency, and institutional accountability because these factors influence the responsible use of business financial information. The framework positions payment-generated data as a central component of financial assessment and connects digital transaction activity with access to formal financial services. The study contributes to the literature by integrating payment technologies, data analytics, AI, and alternative financial assessment within a unified framework focused specifically on underserved small businesses in the United States.
References
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2026). Federal Reserve Payments Study: National payment volumes, top-line data (CY 2015–24). Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2026). Federal Reserve issues initial findings from its 2025 triennial payments study. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Caballero, J., Doerr, S., Mehrotra, A., & Zampolli, F. (2025). How far can digital innovation improve credit to small firms in emerging market economies? BIS Bulletin, 99. Bank for International Settlements.
Cornelli, G., Frost, J., Warren, J., Yang, C., & Velásquez, C. (2024). Retail fast payment systems as a catalyst for digital finance. BIS Working Papers, 1228. Bank for International Settlements.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2025). Small business lending under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B). Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2025). Small business lending under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B): Extension of compliance dates. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. (2026). Small business lending under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (Regulation B). Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Federal Reserve Banks. (2025). 2025 Report on Employer Firms: Findings from the 2024 Small Business Credit Survey. Federal Reserve Banks.
Federal Reserve Banks. (2025). 2025 Report on Firms Owned by People of Color: Findings from the 2024 Small Business Credit Survey. Federal Reserve Banks.
Gambacorta, L., Huang, Y., Qiu, H., & Wang, J. (2024). How do machine learning and non-traditional data affect credit scoring? New evidence from a Chinese fintech firm. Journal of Financial Stability, 73, 101284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2024.101284
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). NIST AI 100-1. U.S. Department of Commerce.
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Generative Artificial Intelligence Profile. NIST AI 600-1. U.S. Department of Commerce.
Tigges, M., Mestwerdt, S., Tschirner, S., & Mauer, R. (2024). Who gets the money? A qualitative analysis of fintech lending and credit scoring through the adoption of AI and alternative data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 205, 123491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123491
U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of Advocacy. (2025). 2025 Small Business Profiles for the States, Territories, and Nation. U.S. Small Business Administration.
World Bank. (2025). The Global Findex Database 2025: Financial inclusion, digital payments, and financial health. World Bank.
Financial Stability Board. (2024). The financial stability implications of artificial intelligence. Financial Stability Board.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Financing SMEs and entrepreneurs 2025: An OECD scoreboard. OECD Publishing.
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (2024). 2023 FDIC National Survey of Unbanked and Underbanked Households. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Information technology—Artificial intelligence—Management system. International Organization for Standardization.
Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital finance and FinTech: Current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87, 537–580.
Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2006). A more complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(11), 2945–2966.
Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington Books.
Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625
Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.
Xu, Y., Kou, G., Peng, Y., Ding, K., Ergu, D., & Alotaibi, F. S. (2024). Profit- and risk-driven credit scoring under parameter uncertainty: A multiobjective approach. Omega, 125, 103004.
Xia, Y., Han, Z., Li, Y., & He, L. (2024). Credit scoring model for fintech lending: An integration of large language models and FocalPoly loss. International Journal of Forecasting.
Zhang, X., & Yu, L. (2024). Consumer credit risk assessment: A review from the state-of-the-art classification algorithms, data traits, and learning methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121484.
Jovanovic, Z., Hou, Z., Biswas, K., & Muthukkumarasamy, V. (2024). Robust integration of blockchain and explainable federated learning for automated credit scoring. Computer Networks, 243, 110303.
Moro, A., Fink, M., & Kautschitz, R. (2015). Reduction in information asymmetry and credit access for small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Financial Research, 38(3), 327–354.
