Author Guidelines Peer Review Publication Ethics Copyright Policy Author(s) Fee Plagiarism Policy Call For Reviewer
Publication Ethics
Econova: A Journal of Business, Commerce, and Economic Research
- Introduction
Econova is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards in all aspects of the editorial and publication process. We follow the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines to ensure fairness, transparency, and integrity across all stages of manuscript submission, peer review, editing, and publishing. This policy outlines the ethical responsibilities of authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher.
- Responsibilities of Authors
Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must submit original work that has not been published or submitted elsewhere. All sources, data, or ideas from other works must be properly cited. Any form of plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, is strictly prohibited.
Data Integrity
Authors are responsible for ensuring the accuracy, validity, and reliability of the data presented in their manuscripts. Fabrication, falsification, or selective reporting of data constitutes research misconduct.
Authorship and Contributions
Only individuals who have made substantial contributions to the research, writing, or analysis should be listed as authors. The corresponding author must confirm that all listed authors have read and approved the final version before submission.
Conflicts of Interest
Authors must disclose any financial, professional, or personal relationships that could influence the research or its interpretation.
Research Ethics Compliance
For studies involving human participants, animals, or sensitive data, authors must provide proof of ethical approval and ensure informed consent where applicable.
Retractions and Corrections
If errors are discovered after publication, authors are obligated to notify the editorial team. When necessary, articles may be corrected, updated, or retracted in accordance with COPE procedures.
- Responsibilities of Editors
Editorial Independence and Objectivity
Editors must make decisions based on the academic merit of submissions, free from personal or institutional bias.
Confidentiality
All submitted manuscripts are treated as confidential. Editors must not share information about a submission with anyone outside the review process.
Conflict of Interest
Editors must recuse themselves from handling manuscripts where a conflict of interest exists and must disclose such conflicts to the editorial board.
Handling Complaints and Appeals
Editors must respond promptly and fairly to ethical complaints, appeals, and allegations of misconduct, ensuring due process and resolution.
Corrections and Retractions
Editors are responsible for publishing errata, corrections, or retractions when errors or misconduct are confirmed in published content.
- Responsibilities of Reviewers
Confidentiality
Reviewers must treat manuscripts as confidential documents and must not use, share, or disclose any content before publication.
Constructive and Objective Evaluation
Reviews should be fair, evidence-based, and respectful, with clear feedback to help authors improve their work. Personal criticism is unacceptable.
Timeliness
Reviewers are expected to submit evaluations within the agreed timeframe. If a delay is expected, they should inform the editor promptly.
Conflict of Interest
Reviewers must disclose any potential conflict of interest and decline review assignments if impartiality is compromised.
Ethical Oversight
Reviewers are encouraged to identify and report suspected plagiarism, data falsification, or ethical breaches to the editorial team.
- Responsibilities of the Publisher
Ethical Oversight and Transparency
As the official publisher, Wenjibra University Press supports Econova’s commitment to editorial independence, transparency, and ethical rigor.
Compliance with Publishing Standards
The publisher ensures adherence to international standards on data sharing, intellectual property, research ethics, and access.
Corrections and Retractions
The publisher collaborates with the editorial board to issue retractions, corrections, or clarifications as necessary.
Promoting Research Integrity
The publisher is responsible for training and supporting editorial staff and ensuring proper handling of ethical issues, misconduct investigations, and data protection.
- Handling Misconduct
Econova maintains a zero-tolerance policy toward misconduct such as plagiarism, duplicate submission, authorship fraud, and data manipulation. Confirmed violations will result in:
- Rejection or retraction of the manuscript
- Banning of authors from future submissions
- Notification to affiliated institutions or funding bodies (if applicable)
- Actions guided by COPE flowcharts and international best practices
All reports of misconduct will be investigated thoroughly and confidentially, ensuring due process for all parties involved.